Fire at the US Minister of Justice for ‘cover-up’ of Epstein files
During a hearing in the United States, the Minister of Justice there, Pam Bondi, was criticized. The reason is her actions in the release of the Epstein files. American expert Michiel Vos speaks in Good Morning Netherlands about “parliamentary wrangling at the highest level”.
A parliamentary inquiry committee questioned Bondi, who according to Vos is in Donald Trump’s inner pocket, about the Epstein story. “Why hasn’t more been released? Why not sooner? Why has so much been omitted from the released material? Democrats in particular, but also Republicans, are angry about that.”
Supermodel
According to Vos, “Supermodel” Bondi has only one job: “Defend Trump at all times. And when things get difficult, she says: ‘He’s the greatest president ever.‘ So for Abraham Lincoln these days, Donald Trump is in her eyes.”
Last Monday, Epstein’s former partner, Ghislaine Maxwell, appeared in court. The British woman kept her jaw tight, but in the meantime the revelations of the Epstein files continue. “That is of course a block to Trump’s leg, because it has been going on since last summer, and actually longer.”
The names of those involved in the Epstein files cannot simply be released. “As a member of parliament you are protected if you say it on the floor of the House of Representatives,” Vos explains. “But they are careful, because they are dealing with a minister who works for Trump and is very intent on not releasing everything. Their boss is also up to his neck in the file.”
See also:
Epstein as super concierge
“But it’s not just Trump, it’s also Bill Clinton,” the correspondent points out. “They are people from the entire elite. The Epstein files are actually a blueprint of how a top elite works in America, that cross-pollination between power and fame. That’s with super concierge Epstein in the middle.”
Michiel Vos
America-correspondent
“The Epstein files are actually a blueprint of how a top elite works in America.”
Prince Constantijn, also on the couch of Goedemorgen Nederland, wonders whether there are other Epsteins. “If there was such a need among all these people to go to such an island… Aren’t there Epsteins that we don’t know about at all? I can’t imagine that this would have happened in the Netherlands, then no government would remain in office, right?”
Cover-up
You are conducting a massive cover-up about Epstein, right from the Justice Department,” Democrat Jamie Raskin said during a hearing with Bondi. Congress decided last November that all information about the sex offender must be released within 30 days.
Information about the victims could be shielded. Raskin, the highest-ranking Democrat on a supervisory parliamentary committee, stated that the names of Epstein’s accomplices have been withheld and that much information still needs to be made public. “Worse, shockingly, the names of many victims have been anonymized.”
DOCUMENTED REFERENCES
Exploring Documented Records
Public interest in the Epstein case continues not only because of court proceedings and testimonies, but also due to the growing body of documented records that help researchers and readers understand the broader context. Beyond legal files and media reports, some independent projects have organized publicly available data connected to Epstein’s activities.
One example is a structured archive of documented Amazon order records, where purchases are cataloged with dates and product details. While individual items do not prove wrongdoing on their own, examining documented information alongside established facts helps paint a clearer picture of the environment and circumstances surrounding the case.
Browse the structured archive of documented order records
For readers looking to review primary-source style data rather than interpretations, exploring compiled records can provide additional context to the broader discussion.
